arq.web
Decision guide · Tourism

Direct bookings vs Booking & OTAs: is your own site worth it?

OTAs bring visibility but charge a commission on every booking. An own site with direct booking recovers margin over time.

By ArqWebUpdated 9 September 20262 min read

What OTAs cost

Platforms charge significant per-booking commissions. At volume, that far exceeds the cost of an own site with maintenance.

When an own site pays off

Past a certain volume, what you pay in commissions in a year covers the site and its subscription — and the rest is margin.

It is not all-or-nothing

The most effective approach is to coexist: use OTAs for discovery and your site to convert direct bookings from people who already know you.

Frequently asked questions

Should I leave Booking?

No. The strategy is to reduce dependence, not cut overnight. OTAs remain useful for reach.

How do I get people to book direct?

A fast, clear site with a simple booking request, social proof and, ideally, a small incentive for booking direct.

Do I need a booking engine?

To start, a direct booking request is enough. A full engine makes sense at higher volume.

A note from ArqWeb

This guide organises checks and decisions for a common situation. Implementation depends on the website, access and systems involved. We can assess your situation if you need help applying these steps.

Let's look at your situation.

Tell us what you need and what you have already. We will reply with next steps and a proposal suited to the work.

Discuss my requirements

Explore further

Direct Bookings vs Booking & OTAs: Is Your Own Site Worth It? | ArqWeb